1989 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 330 kg more than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Mark II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Mark II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Skyhawk | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Skyhawk | Mark II |
Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2810 mm |