1989 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 745 kg more than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | SL |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2570 mm |