1989 Buick Skylark vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1989 Buick Skylark is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1989 Buick Skylark. (160 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 724 kg more than 1989 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Skylark | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Skylark | 62 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1276 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3290 mm |