1989 Buick Skylark vs. 1960 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1989 Buick Skylark is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Skylark (160 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1960 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Skylark weights approximately 310 kg more than 1960 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Buick Skylark (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1989 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Skylark | 1960 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skylark | Taunus |
Year Released | 1989 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1276 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |