1989 Buick Skylark vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1989 Buick Skylark is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Skylark (160 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Skylark weights approximately 610 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Skylark | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Buick | DAF |
Model | Skylark | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1276 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 33 L |