1989 Buick Skylark vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Skylark (160 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2001 Ford 49. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford 49. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford 49 weights approximately 22 kg more than 1989 Buick Skylark.
Because 2001 Ford 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Buick Skylark (251 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 1989 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Skylark | 2001 Ford 49 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skylark | 49 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 3899 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1276 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |