1989 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 470 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Brougham | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Brougham | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2760 mm |
