1989 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 550 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Cadillac Brougham | 1992 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Brougham | Camaro |
Year Released | 1989 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2570 mm |