1989 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Mini Cooper | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | Brougham | Cooper |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2470 mm |
