1989 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 730 kg more than 2006 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3510 mm |
