1989 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 904 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Because 1989 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Brougham | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Brougham | 2 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2489 mm |
