1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1956 Holden FE
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1956 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1956 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 170 kg more than 1956 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 1956 Holden FE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Cimarron | FE |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
