1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1965 Holden EH
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden EH weights approximately 35 kg more than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 1965 Holden EH | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Cimarron | EH |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
