1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1968 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,948 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford GT 40 (424 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 190 kg more than 1968 Ford GT 40.
Because 1968 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 1968 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 424 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2420 mm |
