1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1972 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,090 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1972 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Mustang weights approximately 300 kg more than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1972 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 1972 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4090 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2780 mm |
