1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1984 Ford GT
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford GT would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford GT (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 20 kg more than 1984 Ford GT.
Because 1984 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 1984 Ford GT | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Cimarron | GT |
Year Released | 1989 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2590 mm |