1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1990 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1990 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,157 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1990 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Falcon weights approximately 270 kg more than 1989 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1990 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 1990 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Cimarron | Falcon |
Year Released | 1989 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2800 mm |