1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1990 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1990 Ford Telstar is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1990 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 120 kg more than 1990 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 1990 Ford Telstar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Telstar |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2520 mm |
