1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 130 kg more than 2003 MG ZR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | Cimarron | ZR |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |