1989 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2004 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2004 MCC ForTwo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2004 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 420 kg more than 2004 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Cadillac Cimarron | 2004 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | Cimarron | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1810 mm |
