1989 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Cadillac DeVille. (326 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Cadillac DeVille. 1989 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 2002 Holden HSV has manual transmission. 2002 Holden HSV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Holden HSV | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | HSV |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4467 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 326 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |