1989 Cadillac Fleetwood vs. 2004 Maybach 62

To start off, 2004 Maybach 62 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maybach 62 (542 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 387 more horse power than 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Maybach 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maybach 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maybach 62 (900 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 575 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood. (325 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Cadillac Fleetwood.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Cadillac Fleetwood 2004 Maybach 62
Make Cadillac Maybach
Model Fleetwood 62
Year Released 1989 2004
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4467 cc 5513 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 155 HP 542 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 900 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 2300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.1 mm 82.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 87 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 6 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1640 kg 2805 kg
Vehicle Length 5230 mm 6170 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 3830 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]