1989 Cadillac Solitaire vs. 2011 Volkswagen Phaeton

To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Phaeton is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Solitaire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Solitaire would be higher. At 4,473 cc (12 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Solitaire is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2011 Volkswagen Phaeton is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Cadillac Solitaire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Phaeton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volkswagen Phaeton (500 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Cadillac Solitaire. (325 Nm). This means 2011 Volkswagen Phaeton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Cadillac Solitaire.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Cadillac Solitaire 2011 Volkswagen Phaeton
Make Cadillac Volkswagen
Model Solitaire Phaeton
Year Released 1989 2011
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 4473 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 0 HP 237 HP
Torque 325 Nm 500 Nm
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automated manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]