1989 Chevrolet APV vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet APV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet APV would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet APV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1989 Chevrolet APV. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1989 Chevrolet APV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet APV (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet APV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet APV | 2004 Mazda MX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | APV | MX |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
