1989 Chevrolet Beretta vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Beretta is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Beretta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Beretta (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Beretta should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chevrolet Beretta weights approximately 147 kg more than 1978 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Beretta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Beretta (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Beretta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Beretta | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Beretta | 929 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1297 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |
