1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1950 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 275 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1950 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Camaro | 2CV |
Year Released | 1989 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 10 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 22 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 62 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |