1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | FX |
Year Released | 1989 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 467 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |