1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Holden FE
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Holden FE would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1958 Holden FE. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Holden FE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Holden FE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | FE |
Year Released | 1989 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2670 mm |