1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Camaro | 16 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 238 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2260 mm |