1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 269 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | R 360 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 16 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 22 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 63 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1770 mm |