1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Camaro | 1500 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 71 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |