1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Morris Oxford
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1964 Morris Oxford. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Oxford.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Oxford. (81 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morris |
Model | Camaro | Oxford |
Year Released | 1989 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 81 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2530 mm |