1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Peugeot 204

To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1965 Peugeot 204. (54 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Peugeot 204.

Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Peugeot 204. (89 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Peugeot 204.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Chevrolet Camaro 1965 Peugeot 204
Make Chevrolet Peugeot
Model Camaro 204
Year Released 1989 1965
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5735 cc 1130 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 238 HP 54 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 467 Nm 89 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 64 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2600 mm