1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 329 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Camaro | 600 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2010 mm |
