1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Camaro | Elan |
Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2240 mm |