1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | R-100 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |