1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 132. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 132.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Camaro | 132 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2560 mm |
