1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 228 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | Camaro | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1714 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 57 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2460 mm |
