1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (310 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Camaro | Continental |
Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 76.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2760 mm |