1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 323. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 323.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | 323 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |
