1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 234 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (111 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Camaro | Lynx |
Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 111 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2400 mm |