1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK IV.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Mini MK IV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Camaro | MK IV |
Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 847 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 467 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |