1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | 240 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |