1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1985 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1985 Nissan Micra. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan Micra.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Micra. (73 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1985 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Micra |
Year Released | 1989 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2310 mm |