1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Chevrolet Camaro 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Chevrolet Oldsmobile
Model Camaro Cutlass
Year Released 1989 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5735 cc 2474 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 238 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 467 Nm 179 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2640 mm