1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer. (113 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1990 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Lancer |
Year Released | 1989 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1467 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 113 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2390 mm |