1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1991 Holden Barina
To start off, 1991 Holden Barina is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1991 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1991 Holden Barina.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Holden Barina. (105 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1991 Holden Barina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | Barina |
Year Released | 1989 | 1991 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 467 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2250 mm |