1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1992 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1992 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (239 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1992 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2440 mm |