1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (170 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 626 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2620 mm |