1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1996 Fiat Siena is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Siena. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Siena.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Siena |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |